NCRP Capacity Grants Program – Responses to Applicant Questions

To ensure that all applicants have access to information, the NCRP will post responses to all questions submitted by applicants to this web page weekly (applicant names will not be listed)

Responses to Questions

NCRP Responses to Capacity Grant Applicant Questions – updated January 21, 2026

 

Application/Survey123 Form Questions:

1. Is there a character limit when answering questions in boxes on application form?

The form lists any character limits – in many cases, there is a 3000-character limit, which corresponds to 500-600 words or 4-8 paragraphs.

2. Is there a pdf of the application questions?

Yes, see Appendix B on p. 21 of the Guidelines. You will upload the application by responding to questions on the Survey123 form, but you can use the questions in Appendix B to plan your responses.

3. How do we save our application? Do we need to sign into the application portal?

You do not need to sign into the Survey123 portal. Responses that you enter on the Survey form will be automatically saved. You do not need to complete the application in one session; as long as you re-open the Survey on the same browser, your responses will be saved on the form. Once you hit submit, your responses will be submitted to NCRP and you will no longer have access to them, so we suggest that you save your responses before submitting. You can screenshot or copy & paste the questions and answers into a document on your computer. Another option would be to develop your responses in a word document and then copy them into the Survey 123 portal.

 

Technical Advising Questions:

4. Is it possible to request technical assistance from a specific consultant to help with proposal development?

Technical support is available from consultants specifically contracted by NCRP for the purpose of providing up to 5 hours of advising for each applicant. If you would like to request technical support, please use the form to do so. NCRP is not entering in to individual contracts with other consultants to provide technical assistance for this grant proposal.

5. Who would be a good contact for one-on-one guidance regarding grant applications? 

The Capacity Grants Program webpage provides a form link to request technical advising with application development. Javier Silva and Jessele Perez will respond to Tribal requests and Rose Roberts will respond to non-Tribal requests. They will connect you with the consultants that NCRP has contracted to provide up to 5 hours of technical advising per applicant. We also encourage you to attend the Office Hours, held each Wednesday 1-3 pm starting next Wednesday January 21 and continuing through February 18 (information on the office hours is included here). If you need technical help with any website forms or with submitting your application, reach out to Shelly Hughes or Jessele Perez. We encourage you not to wait until the last minute in case you experience any challenges with the application upload process.

6. Do we look for a TA advisor like in past grants or will NCRP staff serve that role? 

Due to the time frame and the nature of the application, NCRP is offering technical advising of up to 5 hours per applicant, to be provided by consultants that NCRP has contracted with for this purpose.

7. What is the distinction between the office hours and the online question system – what sorts of questions for each?

General questions can be asked using the online form – we will lightly edit the question to ensure the anonymity of the questioner and will provide a definitive answer that has been vetted by the NCRP staff team. Specific questions that are unique to your entity can be asked during Office Hours, as can follow-up questions to those posed during the Workshop or via the website form.

 

Eligible Entity Questions:

8. Can different departments within an entity submit applications for funding?

NCRP will only consider one application per legal entity. NCRP encourages collaboration among departments within a particular entity. In all cases, an entity must have authorization to apply from their Tribe, County, NGO board, or organization lead. Please note that the NCRP Leadership Council evaluates proposals based on regional equity of funding allocation and is interested in providing funding to economically disadvantaged and/or historically underrepresented communities.

9. Is it possible for my organization to make two proposals? One would be for capacity building of an alliance we are a part of and would direct funds towards multiple groups, with my organization serving as the grant submitter/project coordinator.

No, NCRP will only accept one application per legal entity. For applicants who will serve as a grant lead for other groups, you are encouraged to include funds for your own entity as well as for the groups in your alliance in one application (see Guidelines pp.3-4).

10. As a small but growing land trust, would the grant cover a consultant that would help our board determine our conservation priorities? 

See the eligible activities on p.2-3 of the Guidelines. Organizational capacity development, including strategic planning and partner and community engagement, are eligible project activities. Keep in mind that activities eligible for funding should directly support the capacity to plan, fund, and implement a landscape scale portfolio of multi-objective projects that enhance forest health, as well as watershed and community resilience to wildfire. For each funding category that you request, you will be asked to describe how that funding will address the capacity needs and gaps that will allow you to pursue the implementation of your identified project portfolio.

11. We are a research team at a university, focused on developing and shaping markets for non-merchantable woody biomass. However, we’re not a landowner and don’t do direct forest management. We are, however, an important part of the regional and statewide enabling apparatus for sustainable forest management. Our work is important capacity building, but upstream from direct forest management. Would we be considered an eligible applicant? 

Eligible applicants are listed on page 2 of guidelines: Eligible applicants include federally recognized Native American Tribes or non-federally recognized California Native American Tribes listed on the California Tribal Contact List maintained by the Native American Heritage Commission as described in Section 65352.4 of the Government Code, counties and local public agencies, special districts, local Fire and Rescue service providers (including Fire Related Districts, Volunteer Fire Department/Companies, Combination Departments, Career Departments) and non-profit organizations. Universities are not eligible applicants, although 501 (c) (3) non-profits that are associated with universities are eligible applicants. If your research team is not an eligible applicant per the guidelines, you may wish to consider partnering with an eligible entity.

12. (Part 1) For organizations that work throughout the NCRP region in multiple partnerships, can we be a lead applicant for one application and be listed as a recipient for funding in another application (with a different lead)? (Part 2) While you can only be the lead on one application, can an organization be a partner and not lead applicant on more than one application? 

Applicants may be a lead on one application, and a supporting partner on another. Per the guidelines, applicants are asked to list and describe partnerships. Please note that the NCRP Leadership Council will consider regional equity in making its decisions on funding awards.

13. The guidelines seem very clear about the lead applicant only submitting one proposal, but is it possible to submit one as a fiscal sponsor on behalf of a partnership and one as the “implementing lead applicant?” (For completely different projects/scopes).

No, the NCRP will only accept one applicant per legal entity. For applicants who will serve as a grant lead for other groups, you are encouraged to include funds for your own entity as well as for the groups in your partnership in one application (see Guidelines pp.3-4).

14. We’re based out of Lake County, and only a portion of our county lies within the geographic boundary for this funding. When describing our portfolio, are we only to include just projects implemented within that boundary, or can it be within our jurisdiction (county lines)?

This capacity grants program is intended to support the capacity to implement project portfolios within the NCRP region. If the footprint of your project portfolio is partially within the NCRP region and partially outside of it, please specify how the capacity investment you are requesting supports the part of your portfolio that is within the NCRP region.

15. Would a consultant that would guide the process of becoming an accredited land trust be covered? Accreditation is through a program of the Land Trust Alliance and without accreditation a land trust has fewer opportunities.

Organizational strategic planning is an eligible activity for the Capacity Grants Program. For each of the proposed activities in the Capacity Grant budget you submit, NCRP suggests that you articulate how the proposed activities would increase your entity’s capacity to implement the project portfolio that you have identified that enhances forest health, as well as watershed and community resilience to wildfires, that you have identified in Part 2 of the application.

16. Can you please clarify the boundaries of the area for funding?

This map shows the boundaries of the NCRP region. The project portfolio you describe in Section 2 of the application must be located within the NCRP region. A lead entity that is located outside the region must demonstrate that the proposed capacity investments directly benefit communities and landscapes within the North Coast region, and are not investments intended to support the entity’s broader capacity to do work outside the NCRP region. Please note that NCRP policies include a preference for providing funding to entities within the NCRP region, and to supporting economically disadvantaged and historically underrepresented communities.

 

Eligible Activity Questions:

17. The guidelines describe a small water tender as a potential small equipment purchase. What are your specifications for a small water tender that’s less than $50,000? Is it possible to use the funds to upgrade an existing water tender to increase capacity to do fuel reduction/prescribed fire assistance?
And under Track 2 the total grant application is for $75,000 minimum, so an additional $25,000 worth of capacity improvement must be proposed?

Yes, upgrades to existing equipment are eligible; partial funding for equipment where the applicant has other funding match to cover the balance is also eligible.
Yes, the minimum proposal amount under Track Two is $75,000 – proposals that link or integrate equipment purchases with other capacity investments may score higher (see Proposal Applications & Scoring Criteria on p. 9 of the Guidelines). See question below.

18. How many gallons do you consider a “small water tender” listed under equipment? 

A small water tender was used as one example in the guidelines, along with chippers, chainsaws, ATVs, and burn trailers. NCRP defers to applicants regarding their equipment needs. Note that equipment costs are capped at $50,000 and are only available for Track 2 applications (See Guidelines Appendix B, p. 22-23, for caps and conditions on budget items). Applicants should be aware of the equipment requirements listed in Appendix A: Equipment is an item of $5,000 or more per unit cost and has a tangible useful life of more than one year. For any equipment or vehicles purchased or built with funds that are reimbursable as a direct cost of the project, the sub-grantee must be the sole owner on the title. During the sub-grant agreement term, equipment must meaningfully increase the subgrantee’s capacity to perform the tasks outlined in the grant scope of work and the sub-grantee is required to maintain an inventory record for each piece of non-expendable equipment or vehicles purchased or built with funds provided under the terms of a sub-grant agreement. See question above.

19. Is the capacity grant focused on fuel reduction only? My fire response entity is in serious need of capacity building around specific projects but they aren’t fuel reduction related. Is this not the opportunity for us?

Please see p. 2-3 of the guidelines. Note that this program does not fund project implementation, but supports the capacity to plan, fund, and implement a landscape-scale portfolio of multi-objective projects that enhance forest health, as well as watershed and community resilience to wildfires. Capacity support is not restricted to entities working on fuel reduction projects. Capacity support for entities working to enhance watershed and community resilience to wildfires is also eligible, and this includes enhancing the capacity of local fire response entities. See the categories of eligible project activities on p. 2-3 of the Guidelines.

20. Would this grant cover staff hours for managing a grant we have that doesn’t have any staff time written into it (because all funds go to a contractor)?

NCRP suggests that you articulate how the proposed staff hours would increase your entity’s capacity to implement the project portfolio that you have identified that enhance forest health, as well as watershed and community resilience to wildfires.

21. We are looking to include tools and some training time to use those tools for small diameter product building with a business based in Washington for our organization and partners based in Mendocino and Humboldt. We would like to understand more about limitations of working with groups outside of the NCRP region. Clarification of above question: We are looking to purchase a set of tools designed for creating habitat structures and furniture with small diameter poles and associated patents for use in Mendocino and Humboldt region. Training would be folks from Washington coming down here to offer training on using the tools and constructing habitat structures with us and partners.

The Leadership Council has a strong emphasis on supporting partners within the NCRP region and supporting economic development within the NCRP region. Out-of-state travel is not currently an allowable expense under this grant program . Any contractor you hire to provide services must fit within your entity’s purchasing policy. You would need to articulate how this application (including patent development) would increase the capacity of an applicant within the NCRP region to implement an identified project portfolio within the NCRP region.

22. Would this funding source allow for inexperienced staff members to train by participating in prescribed fires led by more experienced regional partners as a way to build capacity for our organization to implement prescribed fire on our own? 

Yes, training and certification are eligible activities under this capacity grants program when the training and certification will increase the capacity to implement your identified portfolio of projects.

23. We are working on a collaborative proposal that encompasses two non-profit organizations within the same watershed that work together as a partnership governed by an MOU. We have this partnership as to not compete for funding (among other reasons) and work on projects on a watershed scale. We have put the partnership name in the entity name. For the entity type – should we select “regional partnership” or would you prefer “non-profit organization”?

Choose the entity type for the lead entity on the collaboration, so in this case, non-profit organization.

 

Track 1/Track 2 Questions:

24. What is the expected funding breakdown between Tracks 1 and 2? 

This is not predetermined and will be decided by the Leadership Council based on the applications received. At least $2 million will be awarded in total. See the Guidelines pp. 5-6 for more on the factors that the Leadership Council will consider in their award decisions.

25. Can you talk more about the difference between Track 1 and Track 2 applications?  Who should apply for Track 1 vs. Track 2?  Does a Track 2 application need to be a partnership-based application?

NCRP defers to the applicant as to how you define your current capacity and which Track you feel is appropriate for your organization. Track 1 is intended to support entities that are building foundational capacity and who may not have a track record of implemented projects, or who may not have a portfolio of projects in the advanced planning or implementation-ready stages. Track 2 is intended to support the capacity of entities with demonstrated experience in past project implementation, who may need expanded capacity support to be able to implement their portfolio of projects. Track 2 does not require partnerships, although evidence of partnerships may lead to higher scores, based on the criteria in the guidelines and NCRP Leadership Council and CA Department of Conservation objectives.

26. Can you give more details about how to decide which tier to apply to? Such as, how many acres we’ve worked on over what time period or a minimum project or organization budget? 

It is expected that Track 2 applicants would be able to include a list of projects that they have completed in their Statement of Qualifications, and to provide more details about the planned Project Portfolio described in Section 2. Track 2 applicants are asked to provide additional information that Track 1 applicants are not required to submit, such as Technical & Reference Supporting documents for the project portfolio and a description of existing partnership & collaborations. The funding range is different for the two tracks and only Track 2 includes equipment purchase as an eligible expense. NCRP suggests that you look carefully at these factors in the grant application and decide which funding track is most appropriate for your entity. Also note that Track 1 & Track 2 applications will be scored and ranked separately, so your application will only be compared to others within the same track.

 

Project Portfolio Questions: 

27. Can you explain more about the ties to implementation that the capacity building needs to have?

The Regional Forest and Fire Capacity Program, DOC, and NCRP are focused on achieving outcomes on the ground that increase wildfire resilience for watersheds and communities. The intention of these capacity grants is to support eligible applicants in developing, expanding, and maintaining the capacity to plan and implement a portfolio of projects that meet the criteria listed in the guidelines. The program does not fund generic capacity building that cannot be tied directly to the implementation of the project portfolio. We encourage you to articulate how the eligible indirect costs and/or personnel costs, consultants, equipment or training costs listed in the guidelines (page 2-3 and 11-13) will result in the implementation of your identified project portfolio. Please keep in mind that this capacity grants program is expected to be highly competitive, and the NCRP Leadership Council will be evaluating the benefits and outcomes from the capacity needs identified by applicants.

28. Can you please explain the portfolio requirement a bit more?

See p. 21 of the Guidelines – there is information there and in other parts of the Guidelines that describe what NCRP and DOC are looking for. NCRP is expecting these capacity grants to support long-term, sustainable capacity enhancement in entities that are leading in their communities on wildfire, forest, and watershed resilience. For example, if an entity asks for funding to enhance capacity to implement a 20-acre invasive species removal project, this is not likely to score well given that this project would not be considered a multi-benefit, landscape-scale project portfolio. Whereas if an entity asks for capacity funding to implement eligible project types or activities within a large-scale footprint, this project portfolio is likely to meet many or most of the criteria in the guidelines. The projects within the portfolio do not have to be contiguous or connected, however, applicants should identify the ways in which each individual project connects to the overall project portfolio to support wildfire resilience.

29. Does either track include community efforts, community preparedness such as fire hardening of structures, water infrastructure improvement, defensible space, road repair such as culverts?

This funding supports your entity’s capacity to implement projects; it does not pay for project implementation. All of the project types described above are valid and acceptable project types to be included in your project portfolio. Question 9 of the Application allows you to choose from the following list of project types in describing the projects in your portfolio:

30. I’m confused about the allowable scope for implementation projects. Are they limited to forest health grants or can they include related projects like workforce development or value-added forest product processing?

No implementation projects will be funded under this program. But in Section 2 of the Application, you are asked to describe the portfolio of projects that you plan to implement, and the ways in which the enhanced capacity provided by this grant will help you to implement. This portfolio of projects is not limited to forest health grants and can include a wide range of project types. See the response above for a list of project types you can include in your project portfolio.

31. Will forest health be prioritized above watershed health/resilience? We have a project in forested lands that is mainly focused on restoring eroding waterways. 

This funding does not cover project implementation. Eligible activities for this NCRP Capacity Grants Program directly support the capacity to plan, fund, and implement a landscape scale portfolio of multi-objective projects that enhance forest health, as well as watershed and community resilience to wildfires See the response above for a list of project types you can include in your project portfolio.

32. This question pertains to “shovel ready” projects with specific plans and permits in place. We will be requesting capacity support to move preliminary plans to shovel ready; can you help us understand how to describe this in the context of the application questions? Can we apply for Track 2 for this capacity need? We are very close to completing programmatic permitting for our watershed forest health projects, so that is accomplished.

Yes, you may apply for Track 2 funding. Project(s) included in the Project Portfolio can be at the implementation (shovel ready) stage, at the planning stage, or even at the conceptual stage. Capacity support requests that move projects in the portfolio from the conceptual or planning to the shovel-ready stage are encouraged. If desired, you may indicate in Question 7 roughly what percentage of your projects are in the implementation/shovel ready, planning, and conceptual stages. You can also use Question 14 to describe how the requested capacity investments will help you advance your projects to the shovel-ready stage.

33. What should we do if our projects meet more than one project type (i.e. biomass utilization and fuels reduction?

You can select multiple project types to describe the projects in your portfolio.

34. Should area of work be described as only the acreage proposed for actual treatment, or the larger parcel boundaries that encompass and will benefit from the treatment?

When you draw the project boundary in Question 8, the tool will automatically calculate the acreage for the whole project portfolio. When you describe the specific treatments by selecting Project Types in Question 9, and enter an estimated budget and estimated acres for each Project Type/treatment, include the acreage proposed for that specific treatment. Different treatments may occur on the same acres (i.e. mechanical thinning followed by prescribed burn – two different treatments on the same acres) or different treatments may occur on different acres within the project boundary (i.e. mechanical thinning in one area, prescribed burn in a different area). This is fine.

35. Is there any guidance on what the minimum acreage of treatment within a proposed portfolio should be to be considered a significant scale?

No.Regardless of total acreage, explain how the increased capacity that would be achieved through this funding will support a landscape level project portfolio that will have a signficant impact related to wildfire, community and watershed resilience. Note that Track 1 and Track 2 applications will be scored separately, and that the expectation is that Track 2 applicants will have a well-developed project portfolio with significant impact. Applicants who wish to work on a smaller area may be more competitive in Track 1.

36. The application asks to draw the project boundary (required) but then has a spot for project boundary upload (optional). If I have input the project boundary (entire watershed) is it still required to draw the project boundary? Our project portfolio has several projects within an entire watershed, so drawing the watershed as a polygon will be less accurate than the upload of the watershed boundary.

Yes, you still need to draw the project boundary. Data is derived from the hand-drawn polygon that will be used by the Leadership Council to make funding decisions. The supplementary map you upload will be helpful in understanding more accurate details of your project portfolio, but the hand-drawn project boundary is required.

37. The guidelines talk about “Benefits to Economically Disadvantaged or Historically Underrepresented Communities”. In our watershed, there is a section cut out that isn’t a mapped disadvantaged community, surrounded by severely disadvantaged communities. A couple of our portfolio projects are in this unmapped area, where across the street we have portfolio projects in a mapped severely disadvantaged community. Our projects will benefit the severely disadvantaged community – will including those projects in the unmapped areas affect the scoring of our proposal? Should we not include any areas in this unmapped area?

NCRP suggests that you include all of the projects in your project portfolio. You can use Question #10 to describe the nuances of the relative inclusion of projects in mapped disadvantaged communities and the unmapped areas and how the project portfolio as a whole benefits the communities you serve.

 

Sub-Grant Budget & Contracting Questions:

38. (Part 1) In terms of collaborating with NCRP staff being financially covered, would staff time to meet with NCRP be a line item we include in the grant application? Do you have a sense of how many hours to plan for? (Part 2) Please explain a little more about the costs of interacting with staff not being in our proposal, but covered outside and how would that work?

This will be negotiated with successful applicants who are awarded funding. There is no need to include this amount in the capacity grant budget on your application. There is an expectation of close collaboration with the NCRP staff team and that time will be covered for your entity’s staff over and above what you asked for in your proposal.

39. Could the grant cover staff hours for a current planning grant we have for design of river habitat enhancements? That grant has very few staff hours built into its budget, yet we are spending hours doing project management.

NCRP suggests that you articulate how the proposed staff hours would increase your entity’s capacity to implement the project portfolio that you have identified that enhance forest health, as well as watershed and community resilience to wildfires.

40. Does this grant run until the end of 2027 if awarded?

Yes, the grant term ends December 31, 2027.

41. Is the $200k for Track Two a firm cap?

For now, yes. If more funding for the program becomes available, the Leadership Council may approve an increase to the amount of funding for proposals that have been awarded funding, but there is no guarantee that they will increase funding above the current cap amounts. The application form will not allow applicants to exceed the listed caps for Track 1 and Track 2 applications.

42. What is the allowable indirect rate? 

Generally, the indirect rate is capped at 20%, but this is nuanced due to the nature of the grant – as a capacity grant, some things are allowed as direct costs that would usually be included in an indirect rate. See Appendix A on p. 11 of guidelines. Read this section carefully and you can bring specific questions to Office Hours.

43. Would it be appropriate to apply for NCRP TA in February in support of anticipated capacity grant activities, or should we wait until award determinations are made?

NCRP TA supports project development and grant applications for on-the-ground projects that improve forest health and increase wildfire resilience. If you have a project that needs consultant support for project and grant development, you are welcome to apply for NCRP TA on February 1. That application will be considered separately from an application you submit to the NCRP Capacity Grants Program. Project and grant development are also eligible activities in the NCRP Capacity Grants Program, so you could also include these activities in your Capacity Grants application.

44. Where should sub-recipients fall in the budget categories?

You can incorporate costs for sub-recipients, contractors, and consultants into the appropriate budget category in Question #15, and describe the cost breakdown for that category in the Description/budget justification box. If a sub-recipient does not fit into one of the budget categories listed, you can include the costs in i. Other and describe how the costs included are directly related to the capacity grant scope of work.

45. In the guidelines regarding indirect expenses, an allowable indirect expense is: “Equipment costs not included as direct costs in the budget.” Does this mean that we could purchase a piece of equipment costing more than $5,000, the allowable maximum as a direct project expense, and have a $5,000 line item and pay an additional amount from our indirect request? Along the same line of questions, could we take the whole of the allowable 20% indirect recovery on the project cost and apply it to an equipment purchase?

Equipment is defined as an item of $5,000 or more per unit cost and has a tangible useful life of more than one year (guidelines p. 13). The maximum that can be spent on small equipment purchase is $50,000 for Track 2 applicants only (guidelines p. 23). $50,000 is the cap on equipment purchases, you cannot add the 20% allowed for indirect costs to the $50,000 maximum cap on equipment purchases.

46. How many NCRP workshops should an applicant budget for? Will time spent traveling and attending the workshops be considered eligible expenses – or just travel and lodging expenses?

Travel, attendance and lodging are all eligible. Please put in placeholder estimates for three workshops in the Eureka area. NCRP realizes that the directions in the guidelines are incomplete at this stage, and will work with applicants who are awarded funding to develop a refined budget for this item.

47. Are there any limitations on paying for salaries? Can staff time pay for work other than managing the grant? Is there a cap on how much of their request can be for staff time?

Staff time is eligible under several budget funding categories provided that the work is directly related to the capacity grant scope of work. There is no overall cap on how much of the budget can be used for staff time. See Gudelines p. 11-12 Staff Costs & Indirect Costs, which provides more detail on allowable costs.

48. Will there be any opportunity for upfront payments – or will it all be reimbursement based?

See Guidelines p. 11: Although payment for services rendered, and costs and expenses incurred, will customarily be made in arrears, advance payments may be considered if a financial hardship is demonstrated. Advance payments will be made solely at the NCRP Administrator’s discretion and decisions will be made on a case-by-case basis. The availability of advance payments to sub-grantees will be contingent upon the ability of Humboldt County (NCRP Grantee) to secure an advance payment from the Department of Conservation (Grantor). Further details of this process will be provided in the sub-agreement, and associated forms will be provided.

49. We need a table and chairs so we can meet with landowners/project partners. Would this be considered supplies (since it’s under $5000) or better to list as “other’?

Include under supplies (i.e. office supplies)

 

 

To submit a question, please use this form: NCRP Capacity Grants Program Question and Request Form