OUTCOME: Ecosystem Conservation and Restoration

Problem

Thousands of acres of private forestlands are at risk of development. Conversion, fragmentation, and development of private forestland have significant consequences for the ecological functions of the forest as well as the communities that live in and near them.

Solution

Community Forests - Support the acquisition and development of Community Forests in interested communities.

Background and Context

Within the North Coast region, thousands of acres of private forestland are changing hands. Much of this land is at risk of being developed for residential or commercial use. The result is often smaller parcels of forestland and increasing fragmentation of ownership. Conversion, fragmentation, and development of private forestland has significant consequences for the ecological functions of the forest as well as the communities that live in and near them. Communities also lose forest-based businesses and jobs, in both forestry and recreation-based economic opportunities. Currently there are limited ways to help protect high-risk forestlands as local working forests that could support themselves and their communities’ values into the future.

Community Forests can provide an alternative to forest development, subdivision, or conversion, and at the same time can provide community benefits such as public access and recreational opportunities, protect vital water supplies and wildlife habitat, serve as a demonstration site for private forest landowners, and provide economic benefits from timber and non-timber products. A Community Forest is most commonly owned by a local entity, often a local government such as a city, Tribe, or non- profit organization, and managed in a manner that balances social, economic, and environmental values. Management decisions are informed by active public participation and made at the local level, giving residents both the opportunity and the responsibility to manage their natural resources effectively and sustainably and to consider where the resources they consume come from. A fundamental premise of community forestry is that public recreational use, wood production, and forest conservation are not mutually exclusive.

For many rural communities, the idea of administering and managing a Community Forest seems daunting. Communities need reassurance that it can be done and often this comes simply by learning of other example projects in towns with similar demographics. They may need help building new capacity, which may take the form of a new volunteer committees within the town governance structure, or an entirely new non-profit organization to coordinate a Community Forest initiative and to manage Community Forest projects. Creating and managing a community‐owned forest requires the collaborative development of a community vision and mission for the forest, a commitment to sharing in the costs and benefits of that forest, and the crafting of a governance and operational structure that ensures consistent, long‐term management for forest resilience and sustainability. Communities may look to supporting institutions to help facilitate the organizing phases in these efforts, provide the staff to coordinate and support volunteer efforts, or provide modest funding to support part-time staffing to reinforce volunteer efforts.

Community-based forestry is a participatory approach to forest management that strengthens communities’ capacity to build vibrant local economies while protecting and enhancing their local forest ecosystems. By integrating ecological, social, and economic strategies into cohesive approaches to forestry issues, community-based approaches give local residents both the opportunity and the responsibility to manage their natural resources effectively and to enjoy the benefits of that responsibility.”

-Aspen Institute

Recommendations

NCRP will continue to evaluate and expand its support for the development of community forests in interested communities. Actions may include advocating for increased annual funding for the USDA Open Space and Community Forest Program, providing technical assistance (including assistance with acquiring funding tools available to rural communities for their community forests), and assisting communities with applying for grants and participating in economic incentive programs, such as Stewardship Contracting.  

NCRP will engage with Tribes, counties, and diverse stakeholders to replicate the example of the Weaverville Community Forest in Trinity County and the Arcata Community Forest in Humboldt County. The Weaverville Community Forest is an example of how a local a community can utilize nearby federal lands for initiating community-based forestry using the stewardship contracting model. Arcata Community Forest provides an example of a community-owned forest. By conducting workshops on the benefits of community forests and providing technical assistance to emerging local efforts to establish community forests, NCRP will highlight how community forests can be one of the cross-cutting approaches to achieving many of the overarching goals of the RPP.

Actions

  • Network with successful community forests in other areas including other parts of California, the upper Midwest, British Columbia, and New England.
  • Expand education and public awareness about the potential role and opportunity for Community Forests.

  • Provide technical assistance to communities with pre-acquisition costs, cash-flow analysis, and creating stewardship plans, management plans, timber harvest plans, etc.

Promote the Community Forest model as a strategy for local and regional land planning and growth management and as a policy emphasis in county General Plans.

Provide training to planners and work to integrate the Community Forest model into planning initiatives related to forestland conservation, land use, growth, wildlife habitat, and water resources management.

  • Assistance to communities to ensure that on-the-ground implementation of forest management and stewardship plans is consistent with the terms of grants and or conservation easements.
  • Landowner assistance programs that currently assist only private landowners and not to public land stewards (including municipalities).
  • Need for cross-county border or multi-town coordination on issues related to forestland conservation and management, wildlife habitat, and water resource management.
  • Need for business planning and sustainable business investment in community forests and forest management including information on and support for local value-added activities related to forest management and ecotourism benefits.
  • Coordination with local and regional land and economic development planning and community development departments.

Provide a forum for counties, Tribes, and local governments to work with state and federal partners to utilize existing funding sources such as the State Revolving Loan (SRF) funds for creating management plans or timber harvest permits, addressing legacy erosion sites, and maintaining or upgrading forest trails, roads, bridges, and culverts within the Integrated Regional Water Management Plan (IRWMP) region.

References and Resources